<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crawler Updated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.guildprogress.com/2010/01/14/crawler-updated-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.guildprogress.com/2010/01/14/crawler-updated-2/</link>
	<description>Development Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 04:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sphing</title>
		<link>http://blog.guildprogress.com/2010/01/14/crawler-updated-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2426</link>
		<dc:creator>sphing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.guildprogress.com/?p=241#comment-2426</guid>
		<description>i realize this is almost irrelevant, but im pretty sure the crawler is broken. for the past day or so its been telling me &quot;New rankings are currently being calculated.&quot; ... &quot;completes (which should only be a few minutes).&quot;

any news on when it might finish ;P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i realize this is almost irrelevant, but im pretty sure the crawler is broken. for the past day or so its been telling me &#8220;New rankings are currently being calculated.&#8221; &#8230; &#8220;completes (which should only be a few minutes).&#8221;</p>
<p>any news on when it might finish ;P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xxav</title>
		<link>http://blog.guildprogress.com/2010/01/14/crawler-updated-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2353</link>
		<dc:creator>Xxav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.guildprogress.com/?p=241#comment-2353</guid>
		<description>It should be fixed. Sorry about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be fixed. Sorry about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suz</title>
		<link>http://blog.guildprogress.com/2010/01/14/crawler-updated-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2347</link>
		<dc:creator>Suz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.guildprogress.com/?p=241#comment-2347</guid>
		<description>Any news on the Putricide achievement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any news on the Putricide achievement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fly</title>
		<link>http://blog.guildprogress.com/2010/01/14/crawler-updated-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2301</link>
		<dc:creator>Fly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.guildprogress.com/?p=241#comment-2301</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to have a commandline-option for selecting a preferred server during startup. I normally have the Crawler running in the background for both servers I am active on - if I remember starting it and then setting it to the servers.

BTW... could you tell us more about how the crawler does automatic crawling? The following question comes to my mind:
- how does it choose, which guild from a preferred Server to crawl? Does it look at age? Rank?
- could you give us some information about how many crawlers would need to be running to bring all guilds up to date within a week or so? And how long it would take with the current average?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to have a commandline-option for selecting a preferred server during startup. I normally have the Crawler running in the background for both servers I am active on &#8211; if I remember starting it and then setting it to the servers.</p>
<p>BTW&#8230; could you tell us more about how the crawler does automatic crawling? The following question comes to my mind:<br />
- how does it choose, which guild from a preferred Server to crawl? Does it look at age? Rank?<br />
- could you give us some information about how many crawlers would need to be running to bring all guilds up to date within a week or so? And how long it would take with the current average?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elyn</title>
		<link>http://blog.guildprogress.com/2010/01/14/crawler-updated-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2205</link>
		<dc:creator>Elyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 22:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.guildprogress.com/?p=241#comment-2205</guid>
		<description>Any news on crawling for the missing achievement by any chance? (putricide achievement)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any news on crawling for the missing achievement by any chance? (putricide achievement)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xxav</title>
		<link>http://blog.guildprogress.com/2010/01/14/crawler-updated-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2140</link>
		<dc:creator>Xxav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.guildprogress.com/?p=241#comment-2140</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve gone ahead and updated the scoring based on what you suggested. This will be reflected Sunday morning when the scoring updates go through.

Thanks for the suggestion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve gone ahead and updated the scoring based on what you suggested. This will be reflected Sunday morning when the scoring updates go through.</p>
<p>Thanks for the suggestion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warspirit</title>
		<link>http://blog.guildprogress.com/2010/01/14/crawler-updated-2/comment-page-1/#comment-2061</link>
		<dc:creator>Warspirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.guildprogress.com/?p=241#comment-2061</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m wondering if you have thought about modifying the point structure to reflect the actual difficulty of the bosses. I understand the &quot;wing&quot; mentality and we all thought the same before it was released. However, we know now that BPC is absolutely NOT a 1500 point step up from Putricide. 

It&#039;s clear now that Blizz intended the end bosses in each wing to be the gate, and not the actual wing itself. 

I feel it would make more sense to have the early bosses in each wing on par with each other and the end bosses similar.

So instead of the points increasing like:
Rot, Fester, Putricide, BPC, BQ, Valithria, Sindragosa, LK
It would be more like:
Rot, Fester, BPC, Valithria, Putricide, BQ, Sindragosa, Lich King

Just a suggestion as this would be a more accurate picture of where a guild really ranks in power and skill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m wondering if you have thought about modifying the point structure to reflect the actual difficulty of the bosses. I understand the &#8220;wing&#8221; mentality and we all thought the same before it was released. However, we know now that BPC is absolutely NOT a 1500 point step up from Putricide. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear now that Blizz intended the end bosses in each wing to be the gate, and not the actual wing itself. </p>
<p>I feel it would make more sense to have the early bosses in each wing on par with each other and the end bosses similar.</p>
<p>So instead of the points increasing like:<br />
Rot, Fester, Putricide, BPC, BQ, Valithria, Sindragosa, LK<br />
It would be more like:<br />
Rot, Fester, BPC, Valithria, Putricide, BQ, Sindragosa, Lich King</p>
<p>Just a suggestion as this would be a more accurate picture of where a guild really ranks in power and skill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xxav</title>
		<link>http://blog.guildprogress.com/2010/01/14/crawler-updated-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1909</link>
		<dc:creator>Xxav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 02:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.guildprogress.com/?p=241#comment-1909</guid>
		<description>@Shadow - Fixed. Thank you for bringing this up. I&#039;m going to implement a process to better monitor this going forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Shadow &#8211; Fixed. Thank you for bringing this up. I&#8217;m going to implement a process to better monitor this going forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shadow</title>
		<link>http://blog.guildprogress.com/2010/01/14/crawler-updated-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1908</link>
		<dc:creator>Shadow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.guildprogress.com/?p=241#comment-1908</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t look like anything has been crawling for over a day. Is the site having problems?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t look like anything has been crawling for over a day. Is the site having problems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fly</title>
		<link>http://blog.guildprogress.com/2010/01/14/crawler-updated-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1902</link>
		<dc:creator>Fly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 10:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.guildprogress.com/?p=241#comment-1902</guid>
		<description>Would it be possible to add the possiblity to crawl all guilds on a given Realm with the local Crawler?

I&#039;d like to have the Crawler pick up the guild with the oldest update date, add it to the queue and then crawl it. Maybe add a limit to how often to crawl automatically to a configurable maximum (like once a day or so).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would it be possible to add the possiblity to crawl all guilds on a given Realm with the local Crawler?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to have the Crawler pick up the guild with the oldest update date, add it to the queue and then crawl it. Maybe add a limit to how often to crawl automatically to a configurable maximum (like once a day or so).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
